Assessment of the Acceptability of the Public and Teachers Towards the Free Education Policy

Authors

  • Suarlin Suarlin Department of Elementary School Teacher Education, Universitas Negeri Makassar, South Sulawesi 90222, Indonesia.
  • Haedar Akib Department of Public Administration, Universitas Negeri Makassar, South Sulawesi 90222, Indonesia
  • Alimuddin Mahmud Department of Educational Psychology and Guidance, Universitas Negeri Makassar, South Sulawesi 90222, Indonesia.

Keywords:

education policy, free education, educational institutions, learning activities

Abstract

This study aims to determine the public acceptance of implementing the free education policy in Makassar, in this case, the parents, teachers, and principals. This qualitative research uses a descriptive approach supported by research data. Data collection is done through; observation, questionnaire, interview, and documentation. Data sources were obtained from parents of students, school teachers, elementary school principals, and the education and culture office of the city of Makassar; then, for the depth of the results of this study selected key informants who received free education funds, respectively; three parents, three teachers and three principals from different schools, different places and times. Likewise, data and information were obtained from key informants at schools that did not receive free funds from students’ parents and teachers. The aim is to obtain comparative data and data triangulation to obtain in-depth research findings. At the same time, the data analysis used is qualitative exploration. The results of the study show that the people of Makassar city, in this case, the parents of students, already know about the implementation of the free education policy in schools or are categorized as good, even though they do not know everything about everything free in schools, regarding the implementation of the free education policy in elementary schools within the city area.

References

Adler, M. J. (1998). Paideia proposal. Simon and Schuster.

Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Aronowitz, S., & Giroux, H. A. (2003). Education under siege: The conservative, liberal and radical debate over schooling. Routledge.

Association, N. M. S. (2003). This we believe: Successful schools for young adolescents: A position paper of the National Middle School Association. National Middle School Association.

Blossfeld, H.-P., & Von Maurice, J. (2019). Education as a lifelong process. Springer.

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford university press.

Ealau, P. (1973). Kebijakan Publik. Handal Pustaka.

Feiyue, Z. (2022). Edutainment Methods in the Learning Process: Quickly, Fun and Satisfying. International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education, 4(1), 19–26.

Ginsburg, K. R., & Health, C. on P. A. of C. and F. (2007). The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-child bonds. Pediatrics, 119(1), 182–191.

Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods. Sage.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.

Lamada, M. S., Sanatang, S., Ifani, A. Z., & Hidayat, D. H. (2022). Evaluation in Assessment of Student Competence: Application of the Indonesian Student Competency Assessment (AKSI) in Elementary Schools. International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education, 4(2), 66–75.

Li, M., & Baldauf, R. (2011). Beyond the curriculum: A Chinese example of issues constraining effective English language teaching. Tesol Quarterly, 45(4), 793–803.

McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. CUP Archive.

O’Connell, M. E., Boat, T., & Warner, K. E. (2009). Committee on the prevention of mental disorders and substance abuse among children, youth, and young adults: research advances and promising interventions. Preventing Mental, Emotional, and Behavioral Disorders among Young People: Progress and Possibilities.

Rachmaniar, R., Yahya, M., & Lamada, M. (2021). Evaluation of Learning through Work Practices Industry Program at University with the CIPP Model Approach. International Journal of Environment, Engineering & Education, 3(2), 59–68.

Suarlin, S., & Ali, M. I. (2020). The Effect of Environmental Education Learning on Students at University. International Journal of Environment, Engineering & Education, 2(3), 49–56.

Suarlin, S., Negi, S., Ali, M. I., Bhat, B. A., & Elpisah, E. (2021). The Impact of Implication Problem Posing Learning Model on Students in High Schools. International Journal of Environment, Engineering & Education, 3(2), 69–74.

Suryahadi, A., & Sambodho, P. (2013). Assessment of policies to improve teacher quality and reduce teacher absenteeism. SMERU Research Institute.

Titmuss, R. M. (1975). Social policy: An introduction.

UNICEF. (2003). The millennium development goals: They are about children. UNICEF.

VanderVen, E. R. (2012). A School in Every Village: Educational Reform in a Northeast China County, 1904-31. UBC Press.

World Health Organization. (2001). The World Health Report 2001: Mental health: new understanding, new hope.

Published

2023-08-31

How to Cite

Suarlin, S., Akib, H., & Mahmud, A. (2023). Assessment of the Acceptability of the Public and Teachers Towards the Free Education Policy. Journal of Social Sustainability Impact, 1(1), 9-16. Retrieved from https://ojs.unpatompo.ac.id/index.php/jssi/article/view/195

Issue

Section

Research Articles