Analyzing the Impact of the 2013 Curriculum and Teacher Performance on Innovation and Achievement in Elementary Schools

Authors

  • Zusyamrah Adriyanti Department of Economic Education, Postgraduate School, Universitas Patompo, Makassar 90233, South Sulawesi, Indonesia.
  • Muhammad Rakib Department of Economic Education, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar 90222, South Sulawesi, Indonesia.
  • Muh. Sri Yusal Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Patompo, Makassar 90233, South Sulawesi, Indonesia.

Keywords:

learning achievements, educational policies, student outcomes, curriculum implementation, quality of education

Abstract

This research analyzes the impact of implementing the 2013 curriculum and teachers' teaching performance on students' learning achievements at Elementary School Mamajang II in Makassar City. The study employs a quantitative approach with an explanatory research design to investigate the relationship between research variables. Data collection took place in August 2021, with a sample of 41 students from grades 4 to 6 selected through random sampling. Data analysis was conducted using the multiple linear regression formula and SPSS 21 statistical software. Additionally, research instrument testing was carried out to ensure the validity and reliability of the measurement tools. The study's findings reveal that implementing the 2013 curriculum and teachers' teaching performance individually positively and statistically significantly influence when considered simultaneously; both factors exhibit a positive and significant impact. The remaining 82.80% variance in students' learning achievements is attributed to unexamined variables. This research contributes significantly to understanding the factors that shape students' learning achievements within the context of Elementary School Mamajang II in Makassar City. The outcomes of this study can serve as a foundation for developing more effective educational policies and strategies to enhance students' learning outcomes. By recognizing the importance of curriculum implementation and teacher performance, educational stakeholders can make informed decisions to improve the quality of education in similar settings.

References

Astuty, E. (2015). Implementation analysis of lecturer’s pedagogical competence on student’s academic achievement. Journal of Management Research, 7(2), 152.

Bloom, B. S., Krathwohl, D. R., & Masia, B. B. (1984). Bloom taxonomy of educational objectives. In Allyn and Bacon. Pearson Education London.

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Ascd.

Brown, A. H., & Green, T. D. (2019). The essentials of instructional design: Connecting fundamental principles with process and practice. Routledge.

Bush, T., & Coleman, M. (1995). Professional development for heads: The role of mentoring. Journal of Educational Administration, 33(5), 60–73.

Coleman, M., & Bush, T. (2000). Leadership and strategic management in education. Leadership and Strategic Management in Education, 1–96.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 1.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Research review/teacher learning: What matters. Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46–53.

Davis, F., & Boudreaux, M. K. (2019). Teacher leaders’ perceptions of charter school principals’ instructional leadership practices. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 9(1), 7.

Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258.

Dislen Daggöl, G. (2019). Learning Climate and Self-Efficacy Beliefs of High School Students in an EFL Setting. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 13(1), 19–35.

Fitria, F., Ruslan, R., & Mappeasse, M. Y. (2021). Application of E-Learning Based on Enriched Virtual Model in the Subject Database. International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education, 3(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.55151/ijeedu.v3i1.47

Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers college press.

Gimbert, B., Bol, L., & Wallace, D. (2007). The influence of teacher preparation on student achievement and the application of national standards by teachers of mathematics in urban secondary schools. Education and Urban Society, 40(1), 91–117.

Gunathilaka, M., & Wijeratne, V. (2022). Pro-Environmental Communication and Behavior in Sustainable Use of Environmental Resources: A Study in Kalpitiya Fisheries Inspector Division, Sri Lanka. International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education, 4(2), 55–59.

Gupta, J. D., Sharma, S. K., & Hsu, J. (2004). An overview of knowledge management. Creating Knowledge Based Organizations, 1–28.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis. Cengage Learning EMEA.

Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. routledge.

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.

Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689.

Idkhan, A. M., & Idris, M. M. (2021). Dimensions of Students Learning Styles at The University with The Kolb Learning Model. International Journal of Environment, Engineering & Education, 3(2), 75–82.

Jackson, L. B., Ryndak, D. L., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2008). The dynamic relationship between context, curriculum, and student learning: A case for inclusive education as a research-based practice. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 34(1), 175–195.

Martin, B. L., & Briggs, L. J. (1986). The affective and cognitive domains: Integration for instruction and research. Educational Technology.

Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. ASCD.

Marzano, R. J. (2017). The new art and science of teaching. Solution Tree Press Bloomington, IN.

Marzano, R. J., & Brown, J. L. (2009). A handbook for the art and science of teaching. ASCD.

Mulyasa, E. (2012). Kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan.

Myers, J. L., Well, A., & Lorch, R. F. (2010). Research design and statistical analysis. Routledge.

Rachmaniar, R., Yahya, M., & Lamada, M. (2021). Evaluation of Learning through Work Practices Industry Program at University with the CIPP Model Approach. International Journal of Environment, Engineering & Education, 3(2), 59–68.

Ramadhan, R. P., & Winata, H. (2016). Prokrastinasi akademik menurunkan prestasi belajar siswa (Academic procrastination reduce students achievement). Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 1(1), 154–159.

Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2016). Creative schools: The grassroots revolution that’s transforming education. Penguin books.

Rogers, C. R. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80’s. In (No Title) (Revised). Merrill Pub Co.

Rohmah, K. K., & Marimin, M. (2015). Pengaruh Persepsi Siswa Mengenai Keterampilan Mengajar, Kompetensi Kepribadian, Dan Kompetensi Sosial Guru, Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Program Studi Administrasi Perkantoran Di Smk Negeri 1 Purwodadi. Dinamika Pendidikan, 10(1), 28–41.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.

Schmidt, W. H., Cogan, L., & Houang, R. (2011). The role of opportunity to learn in teacher preparation: An international context. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 138–153.

Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus. Sage.

Sharma, M. K., & Jain, S. (2013). Leadership management: Principles, models and theories. Global Journal of Management and Business Studies, 3(3), 309–318.

Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. Sage.

Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., & Grant, L. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good? A cross-case analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 339–355.

Suarlin, S., & Ali, M. I. (2020). The Effect of Environmental Education Learning on Students at University. International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education, 2(3), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.55151/ijeedu.v2i3.39

Suarlin, S., Negi, S., Ali, M. I., Bhat, B. A., & Elpisah, E. (2021). The Impact of Implication Problem Posing Learning Model on Students in High Schools. International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education, 3(2), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.55151/ijeedu.v3i2.61

Sudjana, N. (2009). Media pengajaran.

Suryabrata, S. (2006). Psikologi pendidikan suatu pendekatan baru. Bandung. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 66–71.

Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago press.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Ascd.

Woolfolk, A. (2016). Educational psychology. Pearson.

Zaghloul, A. R. (2001). Assessment Of Lab Work: A Three Domain Model; Cognitive, Affective, And Psychomotor. 2001 Annual Conference, 6–217.

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

Adriyanti, Z., Rakib, M., & Yusal, M. S. . (2023). Analyzing the Impact of the 2013 Curriculum and Teacher Performance on Innovation and Achievement in Elementary Schools. Journal of Social Sustainability Impact, 1(2), 13-23. Retrieved from https://ojs.unpatompo.ac.id/index.php/jssi/article/view/260

Issue

Section

Research Articles